State v. Whitfield

Court of Appeals of Georgia

State v. Whitfield

680 S.E.2d 578, 298 Ga. App. 535, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 2255, 2009 Ga. App. LEXIS 726

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 25, 2009

DocketA09A0040

StatusPublished

This text of 680 S.E.2d 578 (State v. Whitfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Whitfield, 680 S.E.2d 578, 298 Ga. App. 535, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 2255, 2009 Ga. App. LEXIS 726 (Ga. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Barnes, Judge.

Following the grant of an interlocutory appeal, the State appeals the holding of the trial court that, if Jimmie D. Whitfield is convicted for violating OCGA § 42-1-12 (n) (2) by providing false information when he registered as a sexual offender, the sentence that can be imposed is limited to imprisonment for not less than ten nor more than thirty years. The State contends the trial court erred because the Code section states that “upon the conviction of the second offense under this subsection, the defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for life.” OCGA § 42-1-12 (n) (3).

*536 Decided June 25, 2009. J. David Miller, District Attorney, Laura A. Wood, Assistant District Attorney, for appellant. Brittney Coons-Long, for appellee.

After the appeal was docketed in this court, however, our Supreme Court issued its opinion in Bradshaw v. State, 284 Ga. 675, 683 (4) (671 SE2d 485) (2008), holding that “the imposition of a sentence of life imprisonment [for violating OCGA § 42-1-12 (n) a second time] is so harsh in comparison to the crime for which it was imposed that it is unconstitutional.” (Footnote omitted.) Accordingly, although not for the reason given by the trial court, Whitfield cannot be sentenced to life imprisonment for violating OCGA § 42-1-12 (n), and resolution of the issue on appeal cannot benefit either party.

Therefore, this appeal is now moot and must be dismissed. OCGA § 5-6-48 (b) (3).

Appeal dismissed.

Miller, C. J., and Andrews, P. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barnes, Judge.

Following the grant of an interlocutory appeal, the State appeals the holding of the trial court that, if Jimmie D. Whitfield is convicted for violating OCGA § 42-1-12 (n) (2) by providing false information when he registered as a sexual offender, the sentence that can be imposed is limited to imprisonment for not less than ten nor more than thirty years. The State contends the trial court erred because the Code section states that “upon the conviction of the second offense under this subsection, the defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for life.” OCGA § 42-1-12 (n) (3).

*536 Decided June 25, 2009. J. David Miller, District Attorney, Laura A. Wood, Assistant District Attorney, for appellant. Brittney Coons-Long, for appellee.

After the appeal was docketed in this court, however, our Supreme Court issued its opinion in Bradshaw v. State, 284 Ga. 675, 683 (4) (671 SE2d 485) (2008), holding that “the imposition of a sentence of life imprisonment [for violating OCGA § 42-1-12 (n) a second time] is so harsh in comparison to the crime for which it was imposed that it is unconstitutional.” (Footnote omitted.) Accordingly, although not for the reason given by the trial court, Whitfield cannot be sentenced to life imprisonment for violating OCGA § 42-1-12 (n), and resolution of the issue on appeal cannot benefit either party.

Therefore, this appeal is now moot and must be dismissed. OCGA § 5-6-48 (b) (3).

Appeal dismissed.

Miller, C. J., and Andrews, P. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

680 S.E.2d 578, 298 Ga. App. 535, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 2255, 2009 Ga. App. LEXIS 726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-whitfield-gactapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack