State v. Whitfield

Supreme Court of Arkansas

State v. Whitfield

280 S.W.3d 29, 373 Ark. 36, 2008 Ark. LEXIS 172

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedMarch 13, 2008

DocketCR 07-640

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 280 S.W.3d 29 (State v. Whitfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Whitfield, 280 S.W.3d 29, 373 Ark. 36, 2008 Ark. LEXIS 172 (Ark. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

PAUL DANIELSON, Justice.

Appellant the State of Arkansas appeals from the circuit court’s dismissal of charges against appellee Renee Whitfield due to an allegedly defective arrest warrant. The sole point on appeal is that the circuit court erred as a matter of law in doing so. As the facts pertinent to this appeal are sufficiently set forth in State v. Richardson, 373 Ark. 1, 280 S.W.3d 20 (2008), handed down this same date, it is unnecessary to do so here. For the reasons set forth in Richardson, we reverse and remand.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PAUL DANIELSON, Justice.

Appellant the State of Arkansas appeals from the circuit court’s dismissal of charges against appellee Renee Whitfield due to an allegedly defective arrest warrant. The sole point on appeal is that the circuit court erred as a matter of law in doing so. As the facts pertinent to this appeal are sufficiently set forth in State v. Richardson, 373 Ark. 1, 280 S.W.3d 20 (2008), handed down this same date, it is unnecessary to do so here. For the reasons set forth in Richardson, we reverse and remand.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

280 S.W.3d 29, 373 Ark. 36, 2008 Ark. LEXIS 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-whitfield-ark-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack