State v. Whitetail

2004 ND 209, 691 N.W.2d 192, 2004 N.D. LEXIS 354, 2004 WL 3104768

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

[¶ 1] Lori Whitetail appealed from a jury conviction for delivery of alcoholic beverages to persons under 21, a class A misdemeanor. Whitetail claims the State failed to introduce sufficient evidence to warrant the jury finding her guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Whitetail states there was no evidence demonstrating she knowingly delivered alcohol to a minor, and she argues the minors involved in the incident “snuck” the alcohol from her home. After reviewing the entire record and looking to the evidence most favorable to the jury’s verdict and the reasonable inferences therefrom, we conclude the State introduced substantial evidence to warrant a conviction. We affirm Whitetail’s conviction under N.D.RApp.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶ 2] GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., DALE V. SANDSTROM, WILLIAM A. NEUMANN, MARY MUEHLEN MARING, and CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, JJ., concur.