State v. White

208 N.W.2d 321, 59 Wis. 2d 354, 1973 Wisc. LEXIS 1432
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided June 29, 1973·No. State 2·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

*355 Per Curiam.

All members of the court participating agree that assignments of error argued on the appeal are, with one exception, without merit. On the remaining issue, the court is evenly divided. The trial judge refused to permit the defendants to be represented at trial by a volunteer, unpaid attorney in addition to court-appointed and compensated counsel and one other volunteer attorney. Mr. Justices Wilkie, Beilfuss, and Hef-eernan would reverse on the ground that error was of constitutional proportions involving the denial of counsel of defendants’ choice. Mr. Justices Hanley, Connor T. Hansen, and Robert W. Hansen would affirm on the ground that error was harmless in light of the fact that the representation afforded by court-appointed counsel and the additional volunteer attorney was concededly competent.

Mr. Chief Justice Hallows took no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. White, 208 N.W.2d 321, 59 Wis. 2d 354, 1973 Wisc. LEXIS 1432 (Wis. 1973).

208 N.W.2d 321 (State v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott Smith v. Greg Kleynerman
2017 WI 22 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2017)
State v. Shears
229 N.W.2d 103 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1975)