State v. . White

87 S.E. 984, 171 N.C. 785, 1916 N.C. LEXIS 182
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 8, 1916·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Allen, J.

It has been held by numerous decisions that it is competent for a witness to use a map upon the trial for the purpose of explaining his evidence, and the first exception of the defendants cannot be sustained. S. v. Harrison, 145 N. C., 410; S. v. Rogers, 168 N. C., 112, and the cases cited.

The exception to the charge is equally without merit.

The evidence is not made a part of the case on appeal, but it sufficiently appears from the charge of the court that the matter in dispute *787 before the jury was whether the defendants did the burning, and not whether they burned the barn without the illegal intent.

The defendants did not contend that they accidentally set fire to the building, but they insisted that they were not there and had nothing to do with it, and the case, therefore, falls directly within the ruling in S. v. Millican, 158 N. C., 617.

There is

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. . White, 87 S.E. 984, 171 N.C. 785, 1916 N.C. LEXIS 182 (N.C. 1916).

87 S.E. 984 (State v. . White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. . Smith
20 S.E.2d 313 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)
State v. . Cade
2 S.E.2d 7 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1939)
State v. . Vick
195 S.E. 779 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)