State v. White

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. White

482 S.W.3d 451, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 91, 2016 WL 519738

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 9, 2016

DocketNo. ED 102888

StatusPublished

This text of 482 S.W.3d 451 (State v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. White, 482 S.W.3d 451, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 91, 2016 WL 519738 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Maurice White (Appellant)- appeals' the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, entered' after a jury 'trial, finding him guilty of one count of possession of a controlled substance. On appeal, Appellant argues that the trial court erred when it overruled his objection to allegedly improper remarks the State made during its opening statement. We affirm. ■

We have reviéwed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a-memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Maurice White (Appellant)- appeals' the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, entered' after a jury 'trial, finding him guilty of one count of possession of a controlled substance. On appeal, Appellant argues that the trial court erred when it overruled his objection to allegedly improper remarks the State made during its opening statement. We affirm. ■

We have reviéwed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a-memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

482 S.W.3d 451, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 91, 2016 WL 519738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-white-moctapp-2016.