State v. White

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. White

260 S.W.3d 439, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1089, 2008 WL 3843581

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 19, 2008·No. ED 90523·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William White (“defendant”) appeals the judgment of the trial court on his conviction for robbery in the first degree. Defendant claims the trial court erroneously allowed the state to present evidence of previous robberies allegedly committed by defendant in other states.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William White (“defendant”) appeals the judgment of the trial court on his conviction for robbery in the first degree. Defendant claims the trial court erroneously allowed the state to present evidence of previous robberies allegedly committed by defendant in other states.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. White, 260 S.W.3d 439, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1089, 2008 WL 3843581 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

260 S.W.3d 439 (State v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related