State v. White

52 So. 238, 126 La. 119, 1910 La. LEXIS 615
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedApril 25, 1910
DocketNo. 18,151
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 52 So. 238 (State v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. White, 52 So. 238, 126 La. 119, 1910 La. LEXIS 615 (La. 1910).

Opinion

LAND, J.

The three defendants were in-dieted for forgery and uttering as true a certain obligation, called a “trade check,” for the payment of money, being for $1, drawn on Gulf Lumber Company in favor of bearer, and purporting to he signed on its face by W. L. Vernon, and to be indorsed on its reverse side by the letters “A. D. M.”

The defendants pleaded not guilty, and two of them, having been convicted, have appealed from the sentence.

There was no motion to quash the indictment, but on the trial the accused requested the court to charge that the instrument referred to in the indictment was not a check or order, within the intent of section 833 or the Revised Statutes of 1870. The “trade check” reads as follows:

“We promise to pay bearer one dollar, two years after demand, in merchandise.
“[Signed] Gulf Lumber Company,
“By W. L. Vernon.”

On the reverse appear the letters “A. D. M.”

The evidence shows that said letters are the initials of A. D. McClellon, and that he and W. L. Vernon were officers of the Gulf Lumber Company.

From the indictment, and the statement of the trial judge, it may be inferred that the instrument in question is in effect an order issued by the company on itself. The judge ruled that the instrument was an order payable under the law in cash, and came within the intent of section 833 of the Revised Statutes of 1870.

Act No. 228, p. 345, .of 1908, provides that the makers of checks, tickets, tokens, or other devices redeemable in whole or in part in merchandise shall be liable on demand in current money of the United States. Hence the instrument, read in the light of the statute, is a perfect promissory note payable to bearer, and, whether considered as a note or an order, is within the purview of section 833 of the Revised Statutes of 1870.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Jackson
111 So. 486 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1927)
State v. Mayfield
86 So. 421 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 So. 238, 126 La. 119, 1910 La. LEXIS 615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-white-la-1910.