State v. Whitaker

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Whitaker

374 S.W.3d 400, 2012 WL 3662716, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1022

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 28, 2012·No. No. ED 96831·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donald Whitaker appeals from the judgment upon his conviction of one count of second-degree drug trafficking, Section 195.223, RSMo 2000. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b) (2012).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donald Whitaker appeals from the judgment upon his conviction of one count of second-degree drug trafficking, Section 195.223, RSMo 2000. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b) (2012).

State v. Whitaker, 374 S.W.3d 400, 2012 WL 3662716, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1022 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

374 S.W.3d 400 (State v. Whitaker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.