State v. . Whisnant
117 S.E. 390, 185 N.C. 611, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 130
This text of 117 S.E. 390 (State v. . Whisnant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. . Whisnant, 117 S.E. 390, 185 N.C. 611, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 130 (N.C. 1923).
Opinion
The defendants excepted to the court’s denial of their motion to dismiss the action, but the evidence was amply sufficient to sustain the verdict. The exception is without merit. S. v. Johnson, 184 N. C., 637; S. v. Jenkins, 182 N. C., 818; S. v. Killiam, 173 N. C., 792; S. v. Carlson, 171 N. C., 818.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. . Jenkins
108 S.E. 767 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1921)
State v. . Johnson
113 S.E. 617 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1922)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
117 S.E. 390, 185 N.C. 611, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-whisnant-nc-1923.