State v. . Whisnant
117 S.E. 390, 185 N.C. 611, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 130
Opinion
The defendants excepted to the court’s denial of their motion to dismiss the action, but the evidence was amply sufficient to sustain the verdict. The exception is without merit. S. v. Johnson, 184 N. C., 637; S. v. Jenkins, 182 N. C., 818; S. v. Killiam, 173 N. C., 792; S. v. Carlson, 171 N. C., 818.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. . Whisnant, 117 S.E. 390, 185 N.C. 611, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 130 (N.C. 1923).
117 S.E. 390 (State v. . Whisnant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. . Jenkins
108 S.E. 767 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1921)
State v. . Johnson
113 S.E. 617 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1922)