State v. Whetsel

North Dakota Supreme Court

State v. Whetsel

2017 ND 237, 902 N.W.2d 924, 2017 WL 4639295, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 258

North Dakota Supreme Court·Decided October 17, 2017·No. 20170141·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Byron Whetsel appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of child abuse, child neglect, and murder. Whetsel argues the guilty verdicts are not supported by sufficient evidence. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Lisa Fair McEvers Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte Jon J. Jensen

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Byron Whetsel appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of child abuse, child neglect, and murder. Whetsel argues the guilty verdicts are not supported by sufficient evidence. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Lisa Fair McEvers Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte Jon J. Jensen

State v. Whetsel, 2017 ND 237, 902 N.W.2d 924, 2017 WL 4639295, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 258 (N.D. 2017).

Pincite

2017 ND 237 (State v. Whetsel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related