State v. Wheeler

104 N.C. 893
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 15, 1889·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Clark, J.:

The evidence tending to show acts of illicit intercourse prior to the former conviction was competent as corroborative evidence, and the Court instructed the jury that it was only admitted as such. State v. Kemp, 87 N. C, 538; State v. Pippin, 88 N. C., 646; State v. Quest, 100 N. C., 413; 2 Greenleaf Ev., § 47.

When the witness answered that she did not know the general character of Guthrie, she should have been stood aside. The subsequent question was rightly excluded. A party has no right to cross-examine his own witness. State v. Perkins, 66 N. C., 126; State v. Parks, 3 Ired., 296; State v. Gee, 92 N. C., 756.

No other errors are assigned, and none appear upon the face of the record. The judgment is affirmed.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Wheeler, 104 N.C. 893 (N.C. 1889).

104 N.C. 893 (State v. Wheeler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Stegmann
213 S.E.2d 262 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1975)
State v. McEachern
194 S.E.2d 787 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1973)
Housley v. State
23 So. 2d 749 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1945)
Cox v. State
205 S.W. 131 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1917)