State v. Wheeler
550 So. 2d 283, 1989 La. App. LEXIS 1565, 1989 WL 105740
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Wheeler. Read the opinion of the Court — 1989 La. App. LEXIS 1334 →
Opinion
We issue this per curiam opinion to correct a misstatement in our original opinion in the above numbered and titled case. In our opinion issued June 29, 1989, 547 So.2d 12, we stated that defendant Barry Diggs had not appealed his conviction or sentence. That statement was in error, as Diggs filed a motion for an appeal which was granted and the defendant’s brief was filed in the name of both defendants.
Therefore, we amend our original opinion to affirm the conviction and sentence of defendant Diggs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Wheeler, 550 So. 2d 283, 1989 La. App. LEXIS 1565, 1989 WL 105740 (La. Ct. App. 1989).
550 So. 2d 283 (State v. Wheeler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Wheeler
547 So. 2d 12 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1989)