State v. Wheeler

756 So. 2d 230, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4809, 2000 WL 484065
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 26, 2000·No. No. 3D99-1102·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals from an order invalidating a sentence which the parties previously stipulated in a plea agreement would be imposed if, as actually occurred, the defendant violated the probation which was granted as a condition of suspending the sentence. We find no basis whatever for this ruling both because the sentence was not an illegal one and because the defendant could not properly be heard to contend otherwise after receiving the benefit of the bargain. See Madrigal v. State, 545 So.2d 392 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Accordingly, the order under review is reversed and the cause remanded for appropriate sentencing in accordance with the prior agreement and the applicable law. See Williams v. State, 594 So.2d 273 (Fla.1992).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Wheeler, 756 So. 2d 230, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4809, 2000 WL 484065 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

756 So. 2d 230 (State v. Wheeler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. State
756 So. 2d 230 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)