State v. Whaley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Whaley

361 N.C. 369

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Whaley. Read the opinion of the Court — 362 N.C. 156 →

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 3, 2007·No. No. 440PA06·Published

Opinion

1. Def’s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA05-948)

2. AG’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal

3. Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S, § 7A-31

1. —

2. Allowed 05/03/07

3. Allowed on the issue whether the Court of Appeals erred in affirming the decision of the trial court to exclude the testimony and evidence offered at defendant’s trial regarding the victim’s credibility and mental state. 05/03/07

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1. Def’s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA05-948)

2. AG’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal

3. Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S, § 7A-31

1. —

2. Allowed 05/03/07

3. Allowed on the issue whether the Court of Appeals erred in affirming the decision of the trial court to exclude the testimony and evidence offered at defendant’s trial regarding the victim’s credibility and mental state. 05/03/07

State v. Whaley, 361 N.C. 369 (N.C. 2007).

Pincite

361 N.C. 369 (State v. Whaley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.