State v. Westside Fish Co.

608 P.2d 562, 45 Or. App. 245, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 2308
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Westside Fish Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 31 Or. App. 299
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided March 17, 1980·No. No. 1288, CA 13991·Published

Opinion

JOSEPH, J.

Defendant was convicted by a jury of possession by a wholesale fish dealer of fish taken for ceremonial purposes. OAR 635-41-040(3)(c).1 Defendant contends that Westside Fish Company is merely an assumed business name, not a legal entity, and so cannot be held criminally culpable under ORS 161.095(1)2 and ORS 161.015(5).3 Evidence at trial, however, disclosed that Westside Fish Company is a partnership. A partnership is a "person” within the meaning of ORS 161.015(5); therefore, it can be held criminally culpable under ORS 161.095(1).4

Defendant’s other assignments of error do not merit discussion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Westside Fish Co., 608 P.2d 562, 45 Or. App. 245, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 2308 (Or. Ct. App. 1980).

608 P.2d 562 (State v. Westside Fish Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 161.095
Oregon § 161.095
§ 161.015
Oregon § 161.015
§ 506.036
Oregon § 506.036
§ 506.991
Oregon § 506.991