State v. West

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. West

502 S.W.3d 717, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 872, 2016 WL 4598533

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 6, 2016

DocketNo. ED 103003

StatusPublished

This text of 502 S.W.3d 717 (State v. West) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. West, 502 S.W.3d 717, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 872, 2016 WL 4598533 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Otis West appeals from the judgment entered on his conviction after a jury trial for domestic assault in the second degree. There was no error in the trial court’s handling of an inconsistency in the jury’s verdict or in the trial court’s failure to sua sponte give a self-defense instruction. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Otis West appeals from the judgment entered on his conviction after a jury trial for domestic assault in the second degree. There was no error in the trial court’s handling of an inconsistency in the jury’s verdict or in the trial court’s failure to sua sponte give a self-defense instruction. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

502 S.W.3d 717, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 872, 2016 WL 4598533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-west-moctapp-2016.