State v. West

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. West

502 S.W.3d 717, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 872, 2016 WL 4598533

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 6, 2016·No. No. ED 103003·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Otis West appeals from the judgment entered on his conviction after a jury trial for domestic assault in the second degree. There was no error in the trial court’s handling of an inconsistency in the jury’s verdict or in the trial court’s failure to sua sponte give a self-defense instruction. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Otis West appeals from the judgment entered on his conviction after a jury trial for domestic assault in the second degree. There was no error in the trial court’s handling of an inconsistency in the jury’s verdict or in the trial court’s failure to sua sponte give a self-defense instruction. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. West, 502 S.W.3d 717, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 872, 2016 WL 4598533 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

502 S.W.3d 717 (State v. West) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.