State v. West
744 S.W.2d 886, 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 185, 1988 WL 8366
Opinion
ORDER
A jury convicted defendant of robbery in the first degree but acquitted him of armed criminal action. Appealing from the conviction, defendant asserts reversal is warranted because the verdicts are inconsistent and the circuit court’s refusal to suppress illegally seized evidence was error. We find no error. An opinion would have no precedential value. Affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. West, 744 S.W.2d 886, 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 185, 1988 WL 8366 (Mo. Ct. App. 1988).
744 S.W.2d 886 (State v. West) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
West v. State
787 S.W.2d 856 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1990)