State v. Werst

59 S.E.2d 835, 232 N.C. 330, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 506
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 9, 1950·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

EkyiN, J.

The testimony of the prosecution was sufficient to take the ease to the jury and to support the verdict for the State. S. v. Cancelmo, 86 Or. 379, 168 P. 721. Consequently the court rightly refused to dismiss the action upon a compulsory nonsuit under G.S. 15-173. Whatever error the court below may have committed in temporarily excluding the evidence of the defendant’s witness, Yelma Smoot, as to the circumstances confronting the accused at the "time in controversy was rendered harmless when the same evidence was subsequently given by the same witness without objection on her further examination. Eaves v. Coxe, 203 N.C. 173, 165 S.E. 345. When it is read as a whole, the charge is free from legal error. Wyatt v. Coach Co., 229 N.C. 340, 49 S.E. 2d 650.

For tbe reasons given, the trial and sentence are sustained.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Werst, 59 S.E.2d 835, 232 N.C. 330, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 506 (N.C. 1950).

59 S.E.2d 835 (State v. Werst) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Anderson
216 S.E.2d 166 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1975)
State v. Peeden
117 S.E.2d 398 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1960)
State v. Tyson
89 S.E.2d 138 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1955)