State v. Werneke

493 S.W.3d 451, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 677, 2016 WL 3610980
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 5, 2016
DocketWD 78740
StatusPublished

This text of 493 S.W.3d 451 (State v. Werneke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Werneke, 493 S.W.3d 451, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 677, 2016 WL 3610980 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Michael Werneke appeals his conviction following a jury trial for child molestation in the first degree, section 566.067, RSMo Cum. Supp, 2013, and sentence as a prior offender to thirty years imprisonment. In his sole point on appeal, he contends that [452]*452the trial court abused its discretion in overruling his objection to the prosecutor’s improper comment during closing arguments on his failure to testify. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
493 S.W.3d 451, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 677, 2016 WL 3610980, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-werneke-moctapp-2016.