State v. Weltikol
This text of 2025 ND 99 (State v. Weltikol) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2025 ND 99
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Tyler Duane Weltikol, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20240336
Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, North Central Judicial District, the Honorable Stacy J. Louser, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Christopher W. Nelson, State’s Attorney, Minot, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; on brief.
Kiara C. Kraus-Parr, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant; on brief. State v. Weltikol No. 20240336
[¶1] Tyler Weltikol appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury convicted him of driving under the influence. He argues the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict. After reviewing the record, we conclude substantial evidence supports the verdict. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2025 ND 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-weltikol-nd-2025.