State v. Weltikol
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2025 ND 99
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v.
Tyler Duane Weltikol, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20240336
Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, North Central Judicial District, the Honorable Stacy J. Louser, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Christopher W. Nelson, State’s Attorney, Minot, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; on brief.
Kiara C. Kraus-Parr, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant; on brief.
State v. Weltikol
No. 20240336
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Tyler Weltikol appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury convicted him of driving under the influence. He argues the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict. After reviewing the record, we conclude substantial evidence supports the verdict. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2025 ND 99 (State v. Weltikol) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.