State v. . Wells

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Wells

183 S.E. 367, 209 N.C. 358, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 478

DecidedJanuary 22, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 183 S.E. 367 (State v. . Wells) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. . Wells, 183 S.E. 367, 209 N.C. 358, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 478 (N.C. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

No reversible error has been made to appear in the trial of the cause. The exception to the judgment does not seem to have been brought forward and discussed in appellant’s brief. Hence, it is deemed to be abandoned. S. v. Lea, 203 N. C., 13, 164 S. E., 737: “Exceptions in the record not set out in appellant’s brief, or in support of which no reason or argument is stated or authority cited, will be taken as abandoned.” Rule 28, Rules of Practice in Supreme Court; In re Beard, 202 N. C., 661, 163 S. E., 748.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

No reversible error has been made to appear in the trial of the cause. The exception to the judgment does not seem to have been brought forward and discussed in appellant’s brief. Hence, it is deemed to be abandoned. S. v. Lea, 203 N. C., 13, 164 S. E., 737: “Exceptions in the record not set out in appellant’s brief, or in support of which no reason or argument is stated or authority cited, will be taken as abandoned.” Rule 28, Rules of Practice in Supreme Court; In re Beard, 202 N. C., 661, 163 S. E., 748.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

183 S.E. 367, 209 N.C. 358, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wells-nc-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack