State v. Wells

1 Mann. Unrep. Cas. 242
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJuly 1, 1880
DocketNo. 6969
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Mann. Unrep. Cas. 242 (State v. Wells) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Wells, 1 Mann. Unrep. Cas. 242 (La. 1880).

Opinion

Manning, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of perjury, and sentenced to confinement at hard labor for five years.

A motion in arrest of judgment was made for insufficiency of the indictment in this, that t! there is no averment which denies, contradicts and falsifies the matter wherein the perjury is assigned.”

[243]*243The information does contain that averment in these words; “ whereas he, the said William Wells then and there well knew that said Henry Williams did not say to him, or to any one in his presence, that he would send Maria Benton,” etc.

This is the only ground taken in the motion in arrest, although there is another argued in the brief, but is not presented by the pleadings.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Mann. Unrep. Cas. 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wells-la-1880.