State v. Wellman

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Wellman

862 N.E.2d 120, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1495

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 28, 2007·No. 2006-1725·Published

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 05AP-386, 2006-0hio-3808. Reported at 112 Ohio St.3d 1420, 2006-0hio-6712, 859 N.E.2d 558. On motion for reconsideration. Motion fails for want of four votes.

Moyer, C.J., and O’Connor, J., would grant the motion, accept the appeal, and hold the cause for the decision in 2006-1245 and 2006-1383, State v. Payne, Franklin App. No. 05ÁP-517, 2006-Ohio-2552.

Lanzinger, J., would grant the motion, accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. Ill, and hold the cause for the decision in 2006-1245 and 2006-1383, State v. Payne, Franklin App. No. 05AP-517, 2006-Ohio-2552.

Pfeifer, J., Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., would deny the motion. Cupp, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin App. No. 05AP-386, 2006-0hio-3808. Reported at 112 Ohio St.3d 1420, 2006-0hio-6712, 859 N.E.2d 558. On motion for reconsideration. Motion fails for want of four votes.

Moyer, C.J., and O’Connor, J., would grant the motion, accept the appeal, and hold the cause for the decision in 2006-1245 and 2006-1383, State v. Payne, Franklin App. No. 05ÁP-517, 2006-Ohio-2552.

Lanzinger, J., would grant the motion, accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. Ill, and hold the cause for the decision in 2006-1245 and 2006-1383, State v. Payne, Franklin App. No. 05AP-517, 2006-Ohio-2552.

Pfeifer, J., Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., would deny the motion. Cupp, J., not participating.

State v. Wellman, 862 N.E.2d 120, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1495 (Ohio 2007).

Pincite

862 N.E.2d 120 (State v. Wellman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related