State v. Welch

212 So. 2d 426, 252 La. 679, 1968 La. LEXIS 2801
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJune 28, 1968
DocketNo. 49038
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 212 So. 2d 426 (State v. Welch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Welch, 212 So. 2d 426, 252 La. 679, 1968 La. LEXIS 2801 (La. 1968).

Opinion

SANDERS, Justice.

The defendant, Wilton A. Welch, was convicted of aggravated assault upon Charles Winn, a misdemeanor denounced by LSA-R.S. 14:37. The City Court judge sentenced him to a term of two years in the parish jail. From his conviction and sentence the defendant appealed to this Court.

The defendant perfected no bills of exceptions in the trial court and filed no brief in this Court.

LSA-C.Cr.P. Article 920 provides:

“The following matters and no others shall be considered on appeal:
[681]*681■
“(1) Formal bills of exceptions that have been submitted to and signed by the trial court in accordance with Article 845, whether or not the bills of exceptions were made a ground for a motion for a new trial; and
“(2) Any error that is discoverable by a mere inspection of the pleadings and proceedings and without inspection of the evidence.”

Since no formal bills of exceptions appear in the record, the Court considers only “error that is discoverable by a mere inspection of the pleadings and proceedings.”

Our examination of the record discloses no such error. We note, however, the trial court heard this misdemeanor case without a jury on November 30, 1967. On May 20, 1968, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its decision in Duncan v. State of Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145, 88 S.Ct. 1444, 20 L.Ed.2d 491, holding the Fourteenth Amendment required a jury trial for simple battery, a misdemeanor, punishable by two years imprisonment and a $300 fine. This decision is prospective only and inapplicable to the present case, the trial of which was completed before the Court announced its holding. DeStefano v. Woods, 392 U.S. 631, 88 S.Ct. 2093, 20 L.Ed.2d 1308. See also Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293, 87 S.Ct. 1967, 18 L.Ed.2d 1199; Johnson v. State of New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719, 86 S.Ct. 1772, 16 L.Ed.2d 882; and Linkletter v. Walker, 381 U.S. 618, 85 S.Ct. 1731, 14 L.Ed.2d 601.

For the reasons assigned, the conviction and sentence are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Seals
233 So. 2d 914 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1970)
State v. Bass
222 So. 2d 865 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1969)
State v. Hochenedel
217 So. 2d 392 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
212 So. 2d 426, 252 La. 679, 1968 La. LEXIS 2801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-welch-la-1968.