State v. Welch

129 P. 977, 20 Cal. App. 807
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedDecember 13, 1912
DocketCiv. No. 1065.
StatusPublished

This text of 129 P. 977 (State v. Welch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Welch, 129 P. 977, 20 Cal. App. 807 (Cal. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

This is an appeal from a judgment entered against plaintiff after order sustaining defendant's demurrer to plaintiff's complaint.

The action is in all respects similar to the action No. 1066,ante, p. 624 [129 P. 974], this day decided, except that it covers a different period of time, and the auditor is joined with the treasurer.

For the same reasons stated in the opinion in the action against the treasurer (No. 1066) plaintiff had no capacity to sue either the treasurer or the auditor, and no cause of action is stated against the treasurer. The court, therefore, did not err in sustaining the demurrer, and the judgment must be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Lennon, P. J., and Kerrigan, J., concurred.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on February 11, 1913.

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Commission in Lunacy v. Welch
129 P. 974 (California Court of Appeal, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 P. 977, 20 Cal. App. 807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-welch-calctapp-1912.