Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Weiss

State v. Weiss

830 P.2d 637, 113 Or. App. 255, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1055
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMay 27, 1992
Docket90-1706, 91-1009; CA A71578, A71579
StatusPublished

This text of 830 P.2d 637 (State v. Weiss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Weiss, 830 P.2d 637, 113 Or. App. 255, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1055 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Under a plea agreement, defendant pleaded guilty to two charges. For each conviction, the trial court imposed an incarceration term and a post-prison supervision term. The court purported to impose a condition on each term of post-prison supervision.

The state concedes that the trial court lacked authority to impose post-prison supervision conditions. State v. Dodson, 111 Or App 643, 825 P2d 662 (1992); State v. Potter, 108 Or App 480, 816 P2d 661 (1991). We accept the concession.

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Potter
816 P.2d 661 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1991)
State v. Dodson
825 P.2d 662 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992)
State v. Dodson
825 P.2d 662 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
830 P.2d 637, 113 Or. App. 255, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1055, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-weiss-orctapp-1992.