State v. Weisbord

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. Weisbord

131 A. 611, 4 N.J. Misc. 93, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 342

DecidedJanuary 28, 1926

StatusPublished

This text of 131 A. 611 (State v. Weisbord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Weisbord, 131 A. 611, 4 N.J. Misc. 93, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 342 (N.J. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mintubn, J.

The petitioners apply for a summary review of their convictions under the Disorderly act by the recorder of North Bergen. The gravamen of the conviction was that they loitered on the highway and interfered with persons lawfully thereon. The complaints against them are defective, in that the particulars of the offense are not specified with sufficient particularity and certainty to inform the petitioners of the places and circumstances upon which the allegations are founded. The petitioners are entitled to be so informed in order that they may be able to- prepare their defense upon the merits. State v. Hatfield, 87 N. J. L. 124; State v. Allgor, 78 Id. 313.

The result is that the convictions below will be set aside.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mintubn, J.

The petitioners apply for a summary review of their convictions under the Disorderly act by the recorder of North Bergen. The gravamen of the conviction was that they loitered on the highway and interfered with persons lawfully thereon. The complaints against them are defective, in that the particulars of the offense are not specified with sufficient particularity and certainty to inform the petitioners of the places and circumstances upon which the allegations are founded. The petitioners are entitled to be so informed in order that they may be able to- prepare their defense upon the merits. State v. Hatfield, 87 N. J. L. 124; State v. Allgor, 78 Id. 313.

The result is that the convictions below will be set aside.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 A. 611, 4 N.J. Misc. 93, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-weisbord-nj-1926.