State v. Weinhaus

459 S.W.3d 916, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 77, 2015 WL 358156
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 27, 2015·No. No. ED 100807·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Jeffrey Weinhaus (“Appellant”) appeals from a jury verdict finding him guilty of: possession of morphine and marijuana, in violation of Section 195.202, RSMo (2011); assault of a law enforcement officer in the first degree, in violation of Section 565.081; and armed criminal action, under Section 571.015 relative to Appellant’s actions toward Sergeant Henry James Folsom. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and [917] the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Weinhaus, 459 S.W.3d 916, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 77, 2015 WL 358156 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

459 S.W.3d 916 (State v. Weinhaus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weinhaus v. Vandergriff
E.D. Missouri, 2021