State v. Weilbacher

531 So. 2d 456, 1988 WL 100077
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 30, 1988·No. 88-K-0925·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

531 So.2d 456 (1988)

STATE of Louisiana
v.
Kerry WEILBACHER.

No. 88-K-0925.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 30, 1988.

*457 John M. Mamoulides, Dist. Atty., Dorothy A. Pendergast, Asst. Dist. Atty., Gretna, for applicant.

Wayne Douglas Mancuso, Harahan, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Granted. The judgment of the court of appeal, which dismissed relator's application for review because the record did not contain a signed judgment, is reversed. In a bench trial a judgment of guilty, pronounced by the judge on the record in open court and recorded in the minutes, is sufficient. The case is remanded to the court of appeal for consideration of and action on the merits of the application.

DENNIS, Justice, dissenting.

The court of appeal judgment is correct: "A valid sentence must rest upon a valid and sufficient ... judgment...." La.C. Cr.P. art. 872; see id., comment (d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Weilbacher, 531 So. 2d 456, 1988 WL 100077 (La. 1988).

531 So. 2d 456 (State v. Weilbacher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Stamm
569 So. 2d 85 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1990)
State v. Wallace
539 So. 2d 123 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1989)
State v. Edwards
537 So. 2d 855 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1989)
State v. Weilbaecher
534 So. 2d 973 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1988)