State v. Weigold

198 N.W.2d 285, 293 Minn. 508, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1259
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided May 26, 1972·No. No. 41789·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A jury found defendant guilty of aggravated robbery in violation of Minn. St. 609.245. An examination of the record discloses ample evidence to sustain the jury’s verdict, and there is no basis for this court to disturb that verdict. State v. Norgaard, 272 Minn. 48, 52, 136 N. W. 2d 628, 631 (1965); State v. Markuson, 261 Minn. 515, 517, 113 N. W. 2d 346,348 (1962).

We do not reach the question of the alleged illegal search since the evidence obtained thereby was not prejudicial, and its use at the trial was merely cumulative.

Defendant was represented by competent counsel throughout the entire proceedings, and his charges against his attorney at this time are wholly without merit.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Weigold, 198 N.W.2d 285, 293 Minn. 508, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1259 (Mich. 1972).

198 N.W.2d 285 (State v. Weigold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Markuson
113 N.W.2d 346 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1962)
State v. Norgaard
136 N.W.2d 628 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1965)