State v. Weigold
This text of 198 N.W.2d 285 (State v. Weigold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A jury found defendant guilty of aggravated robbery in violation of Minn. St. 609.245. An examination of the record discloses ample evidence to sustain the jury’s verdict, and there is no basis for this court to disturb that verdict. State v. Norgaard, 272 Minn. 48, 52, 136 N. W. 2d 628, 631 (1965); State v. Markuson, 261 Minn. 515, 517, 113 N. W. 2d 346,348 (1962).
We do not reach the question of the alleged illegal search since the evidence obtained thereby was not prejudicial, and its use at the trial was merely cumulative.
Defendant was represented by competent counsel throughout the entire proceedings, and his charges against his attorney at this time are wholly without merit.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
198 N.W.2d 285, 293 Minn. 508, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-weigold-minn-1972.