State v. Weeks

Oregon Supreme Court

State v. Weeks

23 Or. 3

CourtOregon Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1882

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 23 Or. 3 (State v. Weeks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Weeks, 23 Or. 3 (Or. 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

Waldo, J.

On the trial of two defendants for larceny, a verdict which reads,. “ We, the jury empanneled to try the above case, find the defendant guilty as charged in the indictment,” is void for uncertainty. Such a verdict cannot be amended on the affidavits of the jurors showing that they intended to convict both defendants: Richards v. Sperry, 7 Wis. 219. Judgment reversed and new trial ordered: Corn v. Call, 21 Pick. 514; Stuart’s Case, 28 Gratt. 967; Hogan v. State, 30 Wis. 428.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Waldo, J.

On the trial of two defendants for larceny, a verdict which reads,. “ We, the jury empanneled to try the above case, find the defendant guilty as charged in the indictment,” is void for uncertainty. Such a verdict cannot be amended on the affidavits of the jurors showing that they intended to convict both defendants: Richards v. Sperry, 7 Wis. 219. Judgment reversed and new trial ordered: Corn v. Call, 21 Pick. 514; Stuart’s Case, 28 Gratt. 967; Hogan v. State, 30 Wis. 428.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 Or. 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-weeks-or-1882.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack