State v. Weeks

Idaho Supreme Court

State v. Weeks

237 P. 702, 41 Idaho 105, 1925 Ida. LEXIS 75

CourtIdaho Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 3, 1925

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 237 P. 702 (State v. Weeks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Weeks, 237 P. 702, 41 Idaho 105, 1925 Ida. LEXIS 75 (Idaho 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

WILLIAM A. LEE, C. J.

— The appellants, John Weeks and Cecil Whitaker, were informed against, with others, by the prosecuting attorney in the district court of the fifth judicial district, in and for the county of Bannock, charged with the crime of grand larceny in the taking, stealing and carrying away of certain cattle, and were convicted of the crime charged in the information. A motion for a new trial was made and denied. From the order denying the motion and the judgment of conviction, this appeal is taken. No brief has been filed by appellants nor has any appearance been made by them or on their behalf. At the time the cause was reached for oral argument in this court the state moved for an affirmance of the judgment in accordance with the provisions of Rule 48 of this court.

*106 Upon an examination of the record, no errors appear in the trial of the cause below, and under this rule the judgment of the court below is hereby affirmed.

"Win. E. Lee, Budge, Givens and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WILLIAM A. LEE, C. J.

— The appellants, John Weeks and Cecil Whitaker, were informed against, with others, by the prosecuting attorney in the district court of the fifth judicial district, in and for the county of Bannock, charged with the crime of grand larceny in the taking, stealing and carrying away of certain cattle, and were convicted of the crime charged in the information. A motion for a new trial was made and denied. From the order denying the motion and the judgment of conviction, this appeal is taken. No brief has been filed by appellants nor has any appearance been made by them or on their behalf. At the time the cause was reached for oral argument in this court the state moved for an affirmance of the judgment in accordance with the provisions of Rule 48 of this court.

*106 Upon an examination of the record, no errors appear in the trial of the cause below, and under this rule the judgment of the court below is hereby affirmed.

"Win. E. Lee, Budge, Givens and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

237 P. 702, 41 Idaho 105, 1925 Ida. LEXIS 75, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-weeks-idaho-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack