State v. Webster

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Webster

17 A.3d 1047, 301 Conn. 905, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 196

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedMay 2, 2011

DocketSC 18787

StatusPublished

This text of 17 A.3d 1047 (State v. Webster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Webster, 17 A.3d 1047, 301 Conn. 905, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 196 (Colo. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 127 Conn. App. 264 (AC 31005), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the defendant’s conviction for sale of narcotics within 1500 feet of a school in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278a (b)?

“2. If the defendant prevails on the first claim, whether the trial court properly instructed the jury on the element of intent for the crime of sale of narcotics within 1500 feet of a school in violation of § 21a-278a (b )?”

EVELEIGH and HARPER, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition. *906 Decided May 2, 2011 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18787. Timothy F. Costello, assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Richard S. Cramer, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 127 Conn. App. 264 (AC 31005), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the defendant’s conviction for sale of narcotics within 1500 feet of a school in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278a (b)?

“2. If the defendant prevails on the first claim, whether the trial court properly instructed the jury on the element of intent for the crime of sale of narcotics within 1500 feet of a school in violation of § 21a-278a (b )?”

EVELEIGH and HARPER, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition. *906 Decided May 2, 2011 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18787. Timothy F. Costello, assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Richard S. Cramer, in opposition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 A.3d 1047, 301 Conn. 905, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-webster-conn-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack