State v. Weber

701 So. 2d 557, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 703, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 1856, 1997 WL 689508
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 6, 1997·No. No. 90493·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review a district court decision certifying the following question to be of great public importance:

WHETHER DAVIS [v. UNITED STATES, 512 U.S. 452, 114 S.Ct. 2350, 129 L.Ed.2d 362 (1994) ], APPLIES TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF CONFESSIONS IN FLORIDA IN LIGHT OF TRAYLOR v. STATE, 596 So.2d 957 (Fla.1992)?

Weber v. State, 691 So.2d 55 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

In State v. Owen, 696 So.2d 715 (Fla.1997), we answered this question in the affirmative. Accordingly, consistent with Owen, we quash the decision below and remand for further proceedings.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, SHAW, GRIMES, HARDING and WELLS, JJ., concur. KOGAN, C.J., dissents. ANSTEAD, J., recused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Weber, 701 So. 2d 557, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 703, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 1856, 1997 WL 689508 (Fla. 1997).

701 So. 2d 557 (State v. Weber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Forgione v. Dennis Pirtle Agency, Inc.
701 So. 2d 557 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)