State v. Webb

Supreme Court of Missouri

State v. Webb

37 Mo. 366

Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided February 15, 1866·Published

Opinion

Holmes, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The indictment was quashed on motion of the defendant. The motion assigns no specific objections to the sufficiency of the indictment, which is drawn in accordance with the statute. (R. C. 1855, p. 565, § 35.)

•' We discover no good reason for sustaining the motion. Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.

Judge Wagner concurs; Judge Lovelace absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holmes, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The indictment was quashed on motion of the defendant. The motion assigns no specific objections to the sufficiency of the indictment, which is drawn in accordance with the statute. (R. C. 1855, p. 565, § 35.)

•' We discover no good reason for sustaining the motion. Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.

Judge Wagner concurs; Judge Lovelace absent.

State v. Webb, 37 Mo. 366 (Mo. 1866).

Pincite

37 Mo. 366 (State v. Webb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.