State v. Webb

34 Kan. 710
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedJanuary 15, 1886
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 34 Kan. 710 (State v. Webb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Webb, 34 Kan. 710 (kan 1886).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

It appears, from the record in this case, that judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff on October 21, 1884, in the district court of Shawnee county; that upon the verbal motion of plaintiff, the court instantly vacated and set the judgment aside and continued the cause for trial upon its merits. To this order there was no objection or exception taken by any of the parties to the action. Thereafter, with the acquiescence of the court and all the parties, the action was pending and undetermined in the district court. Subsequently the case was transferred to the superior court, under the provisions of the statute. The superior court declines to entertain jurisdiction of the cause, upon the ground that the judgment of October 21,1884, Avas a final determination of the rights of the parties, and that [711]*711under the circumstances of this case the district court had no power to vacate the judgment. We think the parties to the action are entitled to have that court hear and determine the same; therefore, a peremptory writ of mandamus will be granted. (Laws of 1885, ch. 120; Laws of 1885, ch. 140; Ex parte Bradstreet, 32 U. S. 634; Ex parte Schollenberger, 96 id. 369.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Golden v. Mitchell
190 P. 785 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1920)
Petitt v. Lewis
114 P. 1071 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 Kan. 710, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-webb-kan-1886.