State v. Weaver

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Weaver

874 S.W.2d 561, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 718, 1994 WL 160368

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 3, 1994·No. Nos. 62193 and 63635·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals his convictions by a jury of attempted forcible rape, § 566.030 R.S.Mo. 1986, one count of first degree assault, § 565.050 R.S.Mo.1986, and one count of armed criminal action, § 571.015 R.S.Mo. 1986.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Appellant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for ineffective assistance of trial counsel.

[562]*562The judgment of the motion court denying appellant’s Rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals his convictions by a jury of attempted forcible rape, § 566.030 R.S.Mo. 1986, one count of first degree assault, § 565.050 R.S.Mo.1986, and one count of armed criminal action, § 571.015 R.S.Mo. 1986.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Appellant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for ineffective assistance of trial counsel.

[562]*562The judgment of the motion court denying appellant’s Rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

State v. Weaver, 874 S.W.2d 561, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 718, 1994 WL 160368 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

874 S.W.2d 561 (State v. Weaver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.