State v. Weatherspoon

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Weatherspoon

895 S.W.2d 644, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 546

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 28, 1995·No. Nos. 65516, 66937·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of first degree burglary, § 569.160, RSMo 1994. He also appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of eiTor are without merit; no error of law appears. The judgment of the motion court is not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of first degree burglary, § 569.160, RSMo 1994. He also appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of eiTor are without merit; no error of law appears. The judgment of the motion court is not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

State v. Weatherspoon, 895 S.W.2d 644, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 546 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

895 S.W.2d 644 (State v. Weatherspoon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.