State v. Weatherford Milling Co.
Opinion
Opinion by
The petition in error and transcript of the record in this case was. filed in tins court April 27, 1911. The plaintiff in error has failed to file any brief in the cause, as required by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. yí). The petition in error shall therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution. Hass et al v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 Pac. 543; Maddin v. McCormick et al., 27 Okla. 779, 117 Pac. 200; McClelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287, 119 Pac. 205; Miller Lumber Co. v. Swink Merc. Co., ante, 130 Pac. 574.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1913 OK 226 (State v. Weatherford Milling Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.