State v. Weatherford Milling Co.

1913 OK 226, 131 P. 683, 37 Okla. 143, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 163
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided April 4, 1913·No. 2556·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

The petition in error and transcript of the record in this case was. filed in tins court April 27, 1911. The plaintiff in error has failed to file any brief in the cause, as required by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. yí). The petition in error shall therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution. Hass et al v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 Pac. 543; Maddin v. McCormick et al., 27 Okla. 779, 117 Pac. 200; McClelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287, 119 Pac. 205; Miller Lumber Co. v. Swink Merc. Co., ante, 130 Pac. 574.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Weatherford Milling Co., 1913 OK 226, 131 P. 683, 37 Okla. 143, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 163 (Okla. 1913).

1913 OK 226 (State v. Weatherford Milling Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maddin v. McCormick
1911 OK 40 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)
Miller Lumber Co. v. Swink Mercantile Co.
1913 OK 147 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)
Maddin v. McCormick
117 P. 200 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)
Hass v. McCampbell, City Clerk
1910 OK 297 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1910)
McClelland v. Witherall
1911 OK 471 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)