State v. Weaselhead

Montana Supreme Court

State v. Weaselhead

230 Mont. 26

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 12, 1987

DocketNo. DC-86-112

StatusPublished

This text of 230 Mont. 26 (State v. Weaselhead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Weaselhead, 230 Mont. 26 (Mo. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

DECISION

The application of the above-named defendant for a review of the sentence for Count I, 5 years for Burglary; Count III, 6 years with 1 year suspended for Burglary; to be served consecutively; $616.50 in restitution to be paid before the 11th month of defendant’s one year probation. Defendant may released early if restitution is paid in full, imposed on January 14, 1987, was fully heard and after a careful consideration of the entire matter it is decided that: the sentence shall remain the same as originally imposed.

This Board deplores the absence of a Presentence Report and recommends that all Sentencing Judges have a PSI prepared.

We wish to thank Bonnie Combes of the Montana Defender Project for her assistance to the Defendant and to this Court.

SENTENCE REVIEW DIVISION Frank M. Davis, Chairman, Thomas C. Honzel, Douglas Harkin, Judges.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DECISION

The application of the above-named defendant for a review of the sentence for Count I, 5 years for Burglary; Count III, 6 years with 1 year suspended for Burglary; to be served consecutively; $616.50 in restitution to be paid before the 11th month of defendant’s one year probation. Defendant may released early if restitution is paid in full, imposed on January 14, 1987, was fully heard and after a careful consideration of the entire matter it is decided that: the sentence shall remain the same as originally imposed.

This Board deplores the absence of a Presentence Report and recommends that all Sentencing Judges have a PSI prepared.

We wish to thank Bonnie Combes of the Montana Defender Project for her assistance to the Defendant and to this Court.

SENTENCE REVIEW DIVISION Frank M. Davis, Chairman, Thomas C. Honzel, Douglas Harkin, Judges.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 Mont. 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-weaselhead-mont-1987.