State v. Way

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Way

58 S.E.2d 716, 231 N.C. 716, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 375

DecidedApril 12, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 58 S.E.2d 716 (State v. Way) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Way, 58 S.E.2d 716, 231 N.C. 716, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 375 (N.C. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:.

Defendant’s only assignments of error relate to the action of the trial court in overruling his objection to certain questions propounded to defendant on cross-examination, but from inspection of the record the impropriety of the questions does not appear, nor do we perceive harm resulting therefrom to defendant’s cause. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and there was no exception to the judge’s charge to the jury. S. v. Sullivan, 229 N.C. 251 (258), 49 S.E. 2d 458.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:.

Defendant’s only assignments of error relate to the action of the trial court in overruling his objection to certain questions propounded to defendant on cross-examination, but from inspection of the record the impropriety of the questions does not appear, nor do we perceive harm resulting therefrom to defendant’s cause. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and there was no exception to the judge’s charge to the jury. S. v. Sullivan, 229 N.C. 251 (258), 49 S.E. 2d 458.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 S.E.2d 716, 231 N.C. 716, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-way-nc-1950.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack