State v. Watts

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Watts

242 S.W.3d 401, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1418, 2007 WL 2993565

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 16, 2007

DocketED 88814

StatusPublished

This text of 242 S.W.3d 401 (State v. Watts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Watts, 242 S.W.3d 401, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1418, 2007 WL 2993565 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Pearl Watts (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment upon his convictions by a jury of the class B felony of domestic assault in the first degree, Section 565.072, RSMo 2000, armed criminal action, Section 571.015, RSMo 2000, the class B felony of burglary in the first degree, Section 569.160, RSMo 2000, the class B felony of kidnapping, Section 565.110, RSMo 2000, the class C felony of felonious restraint, Section 565.120, RSMo 2000, two counts of the class D felony of unlawful use of a weapon, Section 571.080.1(4), RSMo 2000, the class A misdemeanor of violation of an order of protection, Section 455.085, RSMo 2000, and the class A misdemeanor of domestic assault in the third degree, Section 565.074, RSMo 2000. The trial court sentenced Defendant as a prior and persistent offender to a total of twenty-five years’ imprisonment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Pearl Watts (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment upon his convictions by a jury of the class B felony of domestic assault in the first degree, Section 565.072, RSMo 2000, armed criminal action, Section 571.015, RSMo 2000, the class B felony of burglary in the first degree, Section 569.160, RSMo 2000, the class B felony of kidnapping, Section 565.110, RSMo 2000, the class C felony of felonious restraint, Section 565.120, RSMo 2000, two counts of the class D felony of unlawful use of a weapon, Section 571.080.1(4), RSMo 2000, the class A misdemeanor of violation of an order of protection, Section 455.085, RSMo 2000, and the class A misdemeanor of domestic assault in the third degree, Section 565.074, RSMo 2000. The trial court sentenced Defendant as a prior and persistent offender to a total of twenty-five years’ imprisonment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 S.W.3d 401, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1418, 2007 WL 2993565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-watts-moctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack