State v. Watts

952 S.W.2d 337, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1619, 1997 WL 570412
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Watts. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 587
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 16, 1997·No. Nos. 67424, 71311·Published

Opinion

[338]*338 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Watts appeals after sentencing on charges of assault first degree, robbery first degree and armed criminal action. He also appeals denial of Rule 29.15 post conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. No direct appeal issue was briefed. Accordingly, the sentences are affirmed. State v. O’Brien, 857 S.W.2d 212, 215 n. 1 (Mo. banc 1993).

The trial court record supports denial of post conviction relief. The only issue argued by defendant is ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to strike a venireperson. The venireperson stated her ability to be a fair and impartial juror. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The order denying relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Watts, 952 S.W.2d 337, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1619, 1997 WL 570412 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

952 S.W.2d 337 (State v. Watts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. O'BRIEN
857 S.W.2d 212 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1993)