State v. Watts

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Watts

852 S.W.2d 429, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 724, 1993 WL 158389

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Watts. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1231 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 18, 1993·No. Nos. 60702, 62341·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of murder in the second degree and armed criminal action, and the denial of postconviction relief without a full eviden-tiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of murder in the second degree and armed criminal action, and the denial of postconviction relief without a full eviden-tiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

State v. Watts, 852 S.W.2d 429, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 724, 1993 WL 158389 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

852 S.W.2d 429 (State v. Watts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.