State v. Watson

858 S.W.2d 861, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1212, 1993 WL 295103
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Watson. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1364
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 10, 1993·No. No. 62551·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction of second degree burglary, § 569.170, RSMo 1986. He was sentenced by the court as a prior and persistent offender to a term of thirteen years’ imprisonment. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Watson, 858 S.W.2d 861, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1212, 1993 WL 295103 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

858 S.W.2d 861 (State v. Watson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.