State v. Watkins

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Watkins

939 S.W.2d 531, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 284, 1997 WL 75812

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 25, 1997

DocketNos. 66923, 70284

StatusPublished

This text of 939 S.W.2d 531 (State v. Watkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Watkins, 939 S.W.2d 531, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 284, 1997 WL 75812 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment on his conviction by a jury of robbery in the first degree, § 569.020, RSMo 1994, for which he was sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment.¹ We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion inciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment on his conviction by a jury of robbery in the first degree, § 569.020, RSMo 1994, for which he was sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment.¹ We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion inciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

939 S.W.2d 531, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 284, 1997 WL 75812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-watkins-moctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack