State v. Waters

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Waters

219 S.W.3d 785, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 602, 2007 WL 1120248

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 17, 2007

DocketED 88135

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 219 S.W.3d 785 (State v. Waters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Waters, 219 S.W.3d 785, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 602, 2007 WL 1120248 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Andrew Waters (Defendant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment, in accordance with a jury verdict, convicting him of two counts of first-degree robbery in violation of Section 569.020, RSMo 2000. Defendant was sentenced, as a prior offender, to two twenty-year terms of imprisonment, to be served consecutively.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not commit plain error by failing to declare a mistrial sua sponte. Mo. R.Crim. P. 30.20 1 ; State v. Collins, 150 S.W.3d 340, 349 (Mo.App. S.D.2004). An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

1

. All rule citations are to Mo. R.Crim. P, 2006, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Andrew Waters (Defendant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment, in accordance with a jury verdict, convicting him of two counts of first-degree robbery in violation of Section 569.020, RSMo 2000. Defendant was sentenced, as a prior offender, to two twenty-year terms of imprisonment, to be served consecutively.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not commit plain error by failing to declare a mistrial sua sponte. Mo. R.Crim. P. 30.20 1 ; State v. Collins, 150 S.W.3d 340, 349 (Mo.App. S.D.2004). An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

1

. All rule citations are to Mo. R.Crim. P, 2006, unless otherwise indicated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

219 S.W.3d 785, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 602, 2007 WL 1120248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-waters-moctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack