State v. Washington

Texas Supreme Court

State v. Washington

19 Tex. 128

DecidedJuly 1, 1857

StatusPublished

This text of 19 Tex. 128 (State v. Washington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Washington, 19 Tex. 128 (Tex. 1857).

Pincite

Opinion

Wheeler, J.

The indictment is in accordance with precedent, English and American. (Precedents of Indictments, &c., by Wharton, p. 489.) It was so adjudged and approved by the unanimous opinion of the Supreme Court of the Repub[129]*129lie, pronounced by Judge Ochiltree .in the case of Sadler v. The Republic, (Dallam, 610.) There was no occasion for the proposed amendment. The indictment was unquestionably good and sufficient.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wheeler, J.

The indictment is in accordance with precedent, English and American. (Precedents of Indictments, &c., by Wharton, p. 489.) It was so adjudged and approved by the unanimous opinion of the Supreme Court of the Repub[129]*129lie, pronounced by Judge Ochiltree .in the case of Sadler v. The Republic, (Dallam, 610.) There was no occasion for the proposed amendment. The indictment was unquestionably good and sufficient.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 Tex. 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-washington-tex-1857.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack