State v. Washington

89 S.E.2d 864, 243 N.C. 112, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 535
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedNovember 9, 1955
StatusPublished

This text of 89 S.E.2d 864 (State v. Washington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Washington, 89 S.E.2d 864, 243 N.C. 112, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 535 (N.C. 1955).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant assigns as error the court’s denial of his motion for judgment of nonsuit made at the close of the State’s case, and renewed at the close of all the evidence. A careful reading of the record discloses there was ample evidence to carry the case to the jury.

The other assignments of error are to the charge. A study of the charge fails to disclose any error therein of sufficient prejudicial effect to justify a new trial.

[113]*113There are no exceptions to the admission or rejection of evidence, which was in sharp conflict. Under a charge free from prejudicial error the jury found the defendant guilty. The verdict and judgment will not be> disturbed.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 S.E.2d 864, 243 N.C. 112, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-washington-nc-1955.